| TIP: Click on subject to list as thread! | ANSI |
| echo: | |
|---|---|
| to: | |
| from: | |
| date: | |
| subject: | Europe & Russia To Check US Power? |
"Will Europe and Russia seek to check U.S. power?"
Printed on Monday, May 12, 2003 {at} 00:00:26 CDT
Power and Interest News Report (PINR)
(PINR) -- Now that the United States has expressed its desire to
weaken the United Nations politically and to create a new world order in
which the U.S. can become the sole, unrestrained power in the world, it
will be important to watch how Europe responds. Prior to the war in Iraq,
the European states of France and Germany were unwilling to support a
U.S. led invasion. With the weight of the Security Council behind these
two states, governments around the world watched to see if the U.S.
would defy the United Nations and thus upset the balance of world
order. The Bush administration decided to attack Iraq without U.N.
support, which sent ominous signals throughout the world that the U.S.
would no longer be restrained by the decrees of the U.N.
In this new state of affairs, the U.S. will continue to stand unchallenged
on the world stage until another state or group of states attempts to
check its power. As of now, no such entity exists, and the members of
the Bush administration have taken note of this situation and are thus
pushing U.S. interests on the world. Because the U.S. wields an
abundance of economic and military power, other powerful states are
hesitant to stray too far from U.S. interests. China, for example, has the
potential to check U.S. power; however, its growth potential is reliant on
good relations with Washington. Because of the Sino-U.S. relationship,
it will be France, Germany and Russia that will most likely be able to
check U.S. power.
The major power brokers within the European Union -- France and
Germany -- are unhappy with the recent changes in world order. Until
recently, France was able to influence global relations through its
permanent member status in the United Nations Security Council. Now,
with the U.S. replacing the U.N. as the formal center of world order,
France's power on the world stage has been greatly diminished, if not
eradicated altogether. Germany is also unhappy with the United States
limiting the power of Europe so it can become a global hegemon.
Russia, like France, has a permanent seat on the U.N. Security
Council; due to Washington's weakening of the U.N., Russia also
lost considerable power in global affairs. For these reasons,
France, Germany and Russia took a strong stance against a U.S.
attack on Iraq.
But now there are signs that these states are willing to put up
even more resistance. On April 29, the leaders of France, Germany,
Belgium and Luxembourg agreed to work towards a European Security
and Defense Union by the end of 2004. As part of this union, the
four member states would combine resources to create a rapid reaction
force capable of preventing conflicts and managing military problems
anywhere in the world. Furthermore, this force would be commanded by
an independent E.U. military command center just outside Brussels.
Such a force, as stated by French President Jacques Chirac, is
necessary in order to create "balance." Chirac added, "We need a
stronger European Union and a strong United States."
Even more groundbreaking is the recent statements by the defense
ministers of both France and Russia in which they announced mutual
intensified military cooperation and joint weapons production.
Encouraged by Washington's decision to attack Iraq, both Paris and
Moscow had increased political and diplomatic cooperation in recent
months. Military collaboration between the major power brokers of
the European Union and Russia could work to weaken U.S. global power.
The advanced states of the European Union, combined with Russia's
nuclear capability, could act to counter unrestrained U.S. power.
This chain of events would provide the most credible restraint to
current U.S. foreign policy aspirations and once again establish a
world order that relies on balance, rather than one superpower with
unilateral ambitions.
Still, there are several potential obstacles to such an alliance.
The European Union is far from united; after announcing their plan
to build an independent E.U. military command center, the E.U. states
of Britain, Spain, Italy and the Netherlands all detached themselves
from this proposition. Other European member states have reacted coolly.
This lack of cooperation is due to most European member states'
unwillingness to distance themselves politically too far from the United
States. The massive economic, political and military power the U.S.
wields causes most European member states to find their interests best
served by the United States, rather than the central powers of the
European Union. Until relations with the central powers of the European
Union are more appealing than relations with the United States,
European member states will continue to attempt to keep good relations
with both the central E.U. states and certainly the United States.
Russia finds itself in a similar predicament. Moscow still looks to the
United States to help it succeed in the world of globalization and free
trade capitalism. Russia has been waiting for the U.S. to lift Cold War-
era trade restrictions; moreover, Russia also wants acceptance into the
World Trade Organization. Therefore, Russia finds that its national
interests lie in good relations with the United States; this political
reality has kept Russia from swaying too far away from U.S. interests.
Furthermore, as in the case of pro-U.S. European states, Russia does
not yet feel that an alliance with central E.U. states such as France
and Germany would be more beneficial than an alliance with the United
States.
But due to quick developments that often emerge on the global scene,
the relations between these states could quickly change. If the U.S.
takes further action that threatens European and Russian interests,
the U.S. could unwillingly push these former hegemonic states into
an alliance that will work to check U.S. power abroad.
Erich Marquardt drafted this report.
The Power and Interest News Report (PINR) is an analysis-based
publication that seeks to, as objectively as possible, provide insight
into various conflicts, regions and points of interest around the globe.
PINR approaches a subject based upon the powers and interests involved,
leaving the moral judgments to the reader. PINR seeks to inform rather
than persuade. This report may be reproduced, reprinted or broadcast
provided that any such reproduction identifies the original source,
http://www.pinr.com. All comments should be directed to
content{at}pinr.com.
-==-
Source: Power and Interest News Report / Yellow Times .....
http://www.yellowtimes.org/article.php?sid=1340&mode=thread&order=0
Cheers, Steve..
---
* Origin: < Adelaide, South Oz. (08) 8351-7637 (3:800/432)SEEN-BY: 633/267 270 @PATH: 800/7 1 640/954 774/605 123/500 106/2000 633/267 |
|
| SOURCE: echomail via fidonet.ozzmosis.com | |
Email questions or comments to sysop@ipingthereforeiam.com
All parts of this website painstakingly hand-crafted in the U.S.A.!
IPTIA BBS/MUD/Terminal/Game Server List, © 2025 IPTIA Consulting™.