>         I'm telling you publically because I lost your adress.
 > I'm getting tired of C. Hunter's attitude of I can say whatever
 > I want but I don't need to answer anything about it.  I'm sorry,
 > but since I came back online I have been nothing but civil to
 > him.  I'm not going to Charles with the problem because I know
 > he doesn't care.  If he doesn't want to be part of a fairly
 > mature conversation without the childness I see him showing in
 > my oppinion he doesn't need to be here.  I'm not going to be a
 > part of another flame war like I was on Ask a Cop II, so instead
 > I'm telling you.  Do what you will.
Christopher,
The address is right in the rules, posted weekly.
Now:
1) those same rules stipulate that we don't censor content here.  If its on 
topic and civil its allowed.
So if Charles makes a comment and then chooses not to back it up when called 
on it that is his choice.  Those who are "listening in" will choose what to 
think about that.  Either they come to the conclusion that the comment stands 
on its own merit, or they decide that its hogwash.  Either way the matter is 
self correcting.
Its not about individuals or ids here.  Its about ideas and the expression of 
them.  The rise and fall in our common market place [this conference] of 
their own value.
I wish you well.
Yours in partnership,
Paul H.
Moderator
--- Rise and be counted
---------------