TR>  CC>                     It wasn't pretty, and some of the hard feelings
TR>  CC> and confusion still remains, as you see with Charles not responding
TR>  CC> to my funeral question.
TR> I would prefer no response if two people find that they can't communicate
TR> without getting angry and writing hate-mail. That seems to be the adult
TR> thing
TR> to do and not ruin the echo for other people who have no wish to read
TR> hate-mail. I may be mistaken, but I think that Charles Hunter has chosen
TR> "no
TR> response" to keep peace in the echo, and I have no problem with that. I
TR> have
TR> done the same thing with one person for the very same reason.
        No, he has chosen "no response", as you would describe it, because I 
did something unforgivable, as he puts it.  He explained it to me before but 
it was a while back and I think I threw away the message.  If I did an 
unforgivable act, what did the people who s4ent private hate messages nd 
called him at his house do?  I was comparitavely mild.
Peace.
--- CNet/3
---------------