BB>Herman,
 > You'll look what up for yourself? Make sense.
BB>    It made perfect sense, Herman. I'm sorry you failed to comprehend
BB>it.
Apology accepted.
BB>Obviously I will have to keep my use of language to a level you can
BB>cope with.
Yes, I cope best with ethiopian.
BB>To answer your question, I looked up the rules for control
BB>variables in iteration statements.
What good is this to me now, after you didn't quote the original message. How 
am I supposed to remember week old mail?
 > Took a while, but congratulations. How does it feel to
 > actually get some code running for the first time?
 > Pretty good, eh?
BB>    Without the bugs, it would have run immediately. As it was, it took
BB>a minute or two to find and eliminate the impossible from your code. If
BB>you can't take constructive criticism just say so and we'll leave you
BB>alone.
No, that's were you're wrong, drastically, again. The code compiles 
flawlessly with DJGPP and Watcom. I can't be held liable if my code doesn't 
seem to work on obsolete useless 16bit borland compilers who have a max 
dataseg of 64k!
BB>    This whole sarcastic message of yours looks like an attempt to start
BB>a flame war.
That's your interpretation.
... For sale: Hourglass for timing Windows.
--- Ezycom V1.48g0 01fd016b
---------------