CT>>> Why is that? (at the risk of going off topic)  Is it because most
CT>>> of the BBS coders (such as Scott) have concentrated on OS/2, or it
CT>>> is that "TAPI thing" again? 
BJ>> Simple.  There is no 100% working equivalent replacement for OS/2's 
BJ>> SIO/Vmodem written for NT or 95.
DR>> So you've tested COM/IP?
BJ> No, I haven't.  And believe it or not, I would be happy if it works as 
BJ> promised. :-)
I believe you. Just curious if you have tested it.
Dale
--- Msged/NT 4.20 beta 2
(1:379/45@fidonet)
---------------