On Jan 13, 1997, at 22:18, Paul Edwards of 3:711/934.9 wrote:

  Hi Paul,

PE> To start off, does MSGED.EXE, which comes in archive MSGED400.ZIP, 
PE> and is 258632 bytes in size, dated 1996-08-10, have this problem?  If 


  Here's some more JFYI stuff.  I got msged to run after appling the patch
posted in this echo.  But, according to all my tests it's a bit of a cpu
hog under Desqview.  

  Msged 4.00

  This shows the percentage of CPU time used by each window, it's
dynamically updated every few seconds.  In each test node 1 was dialing out
to deliver mail, node 2 was idle or calling out, window 3 was
"sleeping" and window 4 had a version of Msged at the scan screen
with all areas scanned.


HNDL SW TK MAP  TTLMEM SYSMEM  L SYS  CPU TIME CPU UT KY NAME
ee4f  ?  0 5438 650144   1568    1472 10:07.63   2.2%    DV System Task
ea10  1  1 0b62 573952   2144    2112 02:26:55   1.6% MX InterMail Node1
ea5e  2  1 103e 573424   2144    2144 03:06:24   0.0% N2 InterMail Node2
eaae  3  1 1546 573424   2656    2112 00:50.61   0.0% TM Fail Safe
eb06  4  1 1ac2 573424   2656    2656 01:08.89  92.9% BD Big DOS

   Norton's SI;

  Computing Index (CI), relative to IBM/XT: 45.5


  Msged 3.10

HNDL SW TK MAP  TTLMEM SYSMEM  L SYS  CPU TIME CPU UT KY NAME
ee4f  ?  0 5438 650144   1568    1472 10:09.28   1.6%    DV System Task
ea10  1  1 0b62 573952   2144    2112 02:27:00  13.7% MX InterMail Node1
ea5e  2  1 103e 573424   2144    2144 03:06:32  23.1% N2 InterMail Node2
eaae  3  1 1546 573424   2656    2112 00:50.61   0.0% TM Fail Safe
ebd8  4  1 1ae2 573424   2656    2656 00:11.85  61.5% BD Big DOS

  Norton's SI;

  Computing Index (CI), relative to IBM/XT: 86.1


Gary

gcrain{at}infomail.com
@EOT:

--- Msgedsq 3.10

SD®¯wç