On Feb 3, 5:10 pm, Duggy  wrote:
> On Feb 3, 8:21 pm, "John W. Kennedy"
 wrote:
>
> > Aliens are not angels; angels are not aliens.
>
> One race of aliens manipulated our perception of angels and thus the
> generally accepted image of angels are in fact based on those aliens.
Non-sequitur.
> That doesn't prove either way that angels did or didn't exist before
> Vorlon interference or whether the concept existed.
And therefore the Vorlons are irrelevant.
> > In the absence of any further information about Sheridan's rescue, the
> > hypothesis that the rescuer might have been an angelic being could not
> > be ruled out,
>
> He looked like an Angelic being.  Other races thought that it was
> their angel-looking-being.  Are humans less gullible.
You seem to be arguing something like, "All the beings who witnessed
the event drew the same conclusions, and never changed their minds,
even after they found out that Sheridan's rescuer was Kosh." That
makes no sense.
> > but, as far as I know, by this late date, any decently
> > educated person knows the truth.
>
> What truth is that?
That it was Kosh and that the Vorlons had been up to that sort of
thing for a mighty long time. While it is true that we are not
expressly shown Sheridan and Delenn doing this, it is hard to imagine
how or why they could kept it a secret after Corianna VI.
--- SBBSecho 2.12-Win32