CH>SK>I have addressed my beliefs on the subject of commandeering to a
CH>  >point of redundancy. I'll explain it to you...I think that the
CH>  >surrendering of basic rights (in this case the right to own and
CH>  >keep personal property, and not surrendering it without due
CH>  >process) is paramount. Of course silly hypotheticals can be
CH>  >developed to make the case that my rights should be violated, but
CH>  >I won't submit or agree to such violations. The maintaining of
CH>  >basic rights is more important than hypotheticals. I'm
CH>The constitution (the source of your rights) does NOT guarantee that 
CH>your property will not be seized or commandeered.  It ONLY guarantees
CH>that your property will NOT be taken without just compensation.
Please post that part in it's entirety. I'd sure like to see 
it...considering it doesn't exist.
---
* CMPQwk #1.42* UNREGISTERED HANDGUN COPY
--- WILDMAIL!/WC v4.12 
---------------