RW>Having said that you have to look at the election this
RW>way.  Either you are voting to keep Clinton in office
RW>or you are voting to elect Dole.  There are no other
RW>true choices.  If you vote for and support someone
RW>other then Dole and Clinton wins then you effectively
RW>voted FOR Clinton.  Think about who is on Bill's side;
RW>the Brady's, Finsten  and the rest.
DS> No I don't have to look at it *that way*.  If I wanted
You don't have to look at it that way but, as Walter
Cronkite  used to say, that's the way it is.  If
one or the other -=*IS*=- going to win you vote counts
for the winner because it wasn't used to elect the
other guy.
DS> Klinton in office, I'd vote for him.  If I wanted Dole in
DS> office, I'd vote for him. The problem is, I don't want
DS> either one of them.  Therefore, I not voting for either one
If that's what you want then more power to you.  It's
your right to vote for anyone you want.  How ever you
still need to look at it realistically.  Either Dole or
Clinton is going to win in November.  Which one of the
two (neither is NOT an option) would you want to see in
office?  Someone who might sign a bill repealing the
weapon ban or someone who wouldn't sign it even if
doing so would keep him from the fires of hell?
DS> don't see him as any better than Klinton.  I'm hoping that
I do.  For one thing he will want to get his VP elected
in 2000 and therefore he will want to keep the
republican voters happy.  Seeing as most pro gunners
are republicans that will mean, in the very least, not
voting for more gun control.
RW>                      Remember:  Freedom isn't Free!
DS> True!  But are you willing to pay the price?
I have.  I do.  I will.  Have you?  Do you?  Will you?
                      Remember:  Freedom isn't Free!
--- timEd-B11
---------------