SI> program again, and DOS still reported 2000. How did DOS get the year a
SI> when in the CMOS it said 00?? Oh, and the CMOS setup said 2000.
SI>
SI> It would seem, then, that most PCs, even up to this day, have a problem
SI> course, I could be completely wrong. Can anyone shed some light on all
if the year is less than 70 (or something) dos treats it as a year
after 2000 if it's otherwise it treats it as a year before 2000,
simple really. it seems your bios setup guesses the wrong day, but
that's not really a problem as the DOS knows the score...
--- EzyQwk V1.20
---------------
* Origin: CSS Brisbane, Qld, Australia. (61-7-3367-3890) (3:640/350)
|