-
Bombs in the Building: World Trade Center 'Conspiracy Theory' 
is a Conspiracy Fact

By Randy Lavello

By now the misinformation and ignored findings surrounding the 
September 11, 2001 attacks have evaporated the official version into 
the land of fiction. Didn't it seem strange that we learned everything 
of the government version by the next day? Much has been learned about 
the attacks, yet the official version has never changed; it seems as 
though our government thinks the point moot since it used this excuse 
to pass unconstitutional laws and wage wars resulting in oil profits. 
The time has come to admit the sorry truth as a nation, so that we can 
move on - as a nation.  

The planes did not bring those towers down; bombs did. So why use 
planes? It seems they were a diversionary tactic - a grand spectacle. 
Who would want to divert our attention from the real cause of the 
collapse of those towers? It must be those who benefited most from 
these attacks. Let's recount some facts of that dreadful day.  

Any time an aircraft deviates from it's course, the air traffic controller 
requests a military intercept according to military response code 7610-4J. 
This was the first time interceptors were not sent up in the history of 
this policy. The intercept pilots are trained to make a visual check of 
the cockpit - could this be the reason these interceptors were intercepted? 
Planes were sent to the New York area, after unprecedented delay, from 
Falmouth, Massachusetts rather than nearby Ft. Dix or Laguardia. Of 
course, they didn't arrive in time - there was no visual scan of the 
cockpits.  

Captain Kent Hill, retired from the Air Force, explained that the U.S. 
had flown unmanned aircraft, similar in size to a Boeing 737, on 
preprogrammed flight paths from Edwards Air Force Base, California 
to Australia on several occasions. He believes the airliners used 
in the attacks had their on board computers knocked out and were 
subsequently choreographed by an Airborne Warning and Control System. 
Along side Captain Hill, an Air Force officer with more than 100 sorties 
in Vietnam stated, "Those birds either had a crack fighter pilot in 
the left seat, or they were being maneuvered by remote control." We 
know that the technology exists to fly hijacked commercial airliners 
by remote control - it's called "Globalhawk." We also know that the 
military has had an unmanned drone aircraft known as the "Predator," 
since 1994. A saboteur would merely have to reprogram the controls to 
switch from manual to remote; those airliners practically fly themselves 
already with the autopilot. This would require electronic security 
codes - acquisition of electronic codes would also explain the lapse 
of interceptor response due to sabotage. Furthermore, it's a fact 
that Air Force One codes were known and punched in by a rogue source 
on 9/11, proving the presence of an inside, subversive element.  

As usual, it's not a good conspiracy, if it doesn't involve a Bush! 
Introducing Marvin Bush - brother of George Jr. Marvin is a substantial 
shareholder and was on the Board of Directors until 2000 of a security 
company aptly named Securacom. This is not an ordinary security force 
with canvas badges and walkie-talkies; it's an electronic security 
company, which was "coincidentally" involved with Dulles Airport until 
1998. Handling electronic security at Dulles seems like an excellent 
way to gain access to Air Traffic Control communication codes with 
NORAD, which is in charge of intercept missions. According to CEO 
Barry McDaniel, the company "handled some of the security at the 
World Trade Center up to the day the buildings fell down." How 
convenient, huh? Bombs were in those towers - Bush's presidency 
was saved by these attacks - just something to think about.  

Five of the twenty "suicide hijackers" are alive and well according 
to the BBC and they want their names cleared. So who was flying those 
planes? We may never know exactly what happened with those jets; 
what we do know is that the official version crumbles under scrutiny. 
These planes were merely a diversion, as proven by the presence of 
bombs - that's right, PROVEN!  

Before beginning this article, I met Auxiliary Lieutenant Fireman and 
former Auxiliary Police Officer, Paul Isaac Jr. at the World Trade Center 
Memorial. Paul, along with many other firemen, is very upset about the 
obvious cover-up and he is on a crusade for answers and justice. He 
was stationed at Engine 10, across the street from the World Trade 
Center in 1998 and 99; Engine 10 was entirely wiped out in the 
destruction of the towers. He explained to me that, omany other firemen 
know there were bombs in the buildings, but they're afraid for their jobs 
to admit it because the "higher-ups" forbid discussion of this fact. Paul 
further elaborated that former CIA director Robert Woolsey, as the Fire 
Department's Anti-terrorism Consultant, is sending a gag order down 
the ranks. "There were definitely bombs in those buildings," he told me. 
He explained to me that, if the building had "pancaked" as it's been 
called, the falling floors would have met great resistance from the steel 
support columns, which would have sent debris flying outward into the 
surrounding blocks. I asked him about the trusses, and quoted the 
history channel's "don't trust a truss" explanation for the collapses. 
He responded in disbelief, and told me, "You could never build a truss 
building that high. A slight wind would knock it over! Those buildings 
were supported by reinforced steel. Building don't just implode like 
that; this was a demolition."

Just after the disaster, Firefighter Louie Cacchioli said, "We think 
there were bombs set in the building." Notice he said "we". At 9:04, 
just after flight 175 collided with the South Tower, a huge explosion 
shot 550 feet into the air from the U.S. Customs House known as WTC 6. 
A huge crater scars the ground where this building once stood. Something 
blew up WTC 6 - it wasn't a plane; it must have been a bomb of some sort.  

The seismic record from Columbia University's observatory in Palisades, 
NY (21 miles away) provides indisputable proof that massive explosions 
brought down those towers. At the precise moment the South Tower 
began collapsing, a 2.1 earthquake registered on the seismograph. At 
the precise moment the North Tower began collapsing, a 2.3 earthquake 
registered; however, as the buildings started to crumble these waves 
disappeared. The two "spikes"on the seismograph, which both occurred 
at the exact instants the collapses began, are twenty times the 
amplitude, or more than 100 times the force of the other waves. If the 
buildings had simply collapsed, the largest jolts would have occurred 
when the massive debris struck the earth, not at the beginnings of the 
collapses. Seismologist Arthur Lerner-Lam of Columbia University 
stated, oOnly a small fraction of the energy from the collapsing towers 
was converted into ground motion. The ground shaking that resulted 
from the collapse of the towers was extremely small.oe In other words, 
the collapsing did not cause 2.1 and 2.3 magnitude earthquakes. 
Furthermore, a "sharp spike of short duration" is how underground 
nuclear explosions register on seismographs. Underground explosions, 
where the steel columns meet Manhattans granite would account for 
both the demolition-style implosions and these "spikes" on the 
seismograph. Another seismologist at the Palisades observatory, Won 
Young Kim said the 1993 truck bomb did not even register on their 
seismographs because the explosion was "not coupled" to the ground. 
Imagine the magnitude of explosions it would take to register the two 
earthquakes, when the truck bomb didn't even show up.  

/CONT/

---