JS> Why does RJ need to be vouched for? Are we automatically mistrusting
 JS> people now?

   No we aren't. But shouldn't we expect an FTSC member to at least be able to
run a reliable FTN system?

   Clay has for more than six months now published empty messages in the stats
echo, and every attempt to make him netmail aware of this has gone unanswered
-- crash mail almost never work.

   He is also RC11, but his segment is a real mess. One would at least expect
that an FTSC member that is also an RC would know how a proper nodelist entry
should look like.

   Add to that that during his entire tenure he hasn't posted a single message
in either the FTSC echo nor this one. Great help he has been...

   Oh, BTW, that last comment also goes for Mark Hofmann. Are those the people
that y'all expect to do some serious work for the FTSC?



..

--- Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; sv-SE; rv:1.9.1.16) Gecko/20101125