On 2019 May 23 14:42:00, you wrote to Dan Clough:

 DC>> It is if my tax dollars are being used to pay/support (which they
 DC>> are).

 HD> If the baby is made by a rape, that boy should pay the abortion or the
 HD> adoption. If that boy is not found, the government should pay the
 HD> abortion, until the police finds the boy. After that the boy has to
 HD> pay back afterwards.

boy???

[quote]
An 11-year-old girl in Ohio was allegedly raped by a 26-year-old multiple
times, leaving her pregnant, according to police reports. A state law passed in
April, but not yet in effect, says that victims like her won't have a choice to
have an abortion -- they would have to carry and deliver their rapist's child.

The law prohibits women from obtaining an abortion after a fetal heartbeat is
detected, about five or six weeks into a pregnancy, before most women even know
that they're pregnant.

The law provides no exceptions for rape or incest.
[/quote]

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/ohio-abortion-heartbeat-bill-pregnant-11-year-old-
rape-victim-barred-abortion-after-new-ohio-abortion- bill-2019-05-13/

or

https://tinyurl.com/yyq2vr3f
https://preview.tinyurl.com/yyq2vr3f

and the worst part? these states that are trying to pass these laws have no
women on the committees doing this... there's no input from females that are
affected by these laws... then there's the reports that these laws are being
passed by these states with the specific intention of taking the cases to the
supreme court... a supreme court now loaded with those not in favor of "roe vs
wade"... one of the new justices has been accused of plagiarism (included
other's work in a book without proper attribution) and the other accused of
sexual assault and/or sexual misconduct by three women; also accused of lying
to the judicial committee...

FWIW and for those that do not know:

Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S. 113 (1973), was a landmark decision of the U.S. Supreme
Court in which the Court ruled that the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth
Amendment to the U.S. Constitution provides a fundamental "right to privacy"
that protects a pregnant woman's liberty to choose whether or not to have an
abortion. However, it ruled that this right is not absolute, and must be
balanced against the government's interests in protecting women's health and
protecting prenatal life. The Court resolved this balancing test by tying state
regulation of abortion to the three trimesters of pregnancy: the Court ruled
that during the first trimester, governments could not prohibit abortions at
all; during the second trimester, governments could require reasonable health
regulations; during the third trimester, abortions could be prohibited entirely
so long as the laws contained exceptions for cases when abortion was necessary
to save the life of the mother. Because the Court classified the right to
choose to have an abortion as "fundamental", the decision required courts to
evaluate challenged abortion laws under the "strict scrutiny" standard, the
highest level of judicial review in the United States.


)\/(ark

Always Mount a Scratch Monkey
Do you manage your own servers? If you are not running an IDS/IPS yer doin' it
wrong...
... If we weren't meant to eat animals why are they made of meat?
---