On Jan 17, 1997, at 18:48, Matthew Parker of 3:711/934.31 wrote:

  Hi Matthew,

MP>  I'm releasing a better patch in the echo today. The original was 
MP> only a quick bypass of the time release function to see if that was the 
MP> problem.

  The new patch is definitely an improvement on your original but the 386
version is still better.


HNDL SW TK MAP  TTLMEM SYSMEM  L SYS  CPU TIME CPU UT KY NAME
ee4f  ?  0 5438 650144   1568    1472 05:59.04   0.5%    DV System Task
ea10  1  1 0b62 573952   2144    2144 01:44:46   2.7% MX InterMail Node1
ea5e  2  1 103e 573424   2624    2624 02:05:16   9.9% N2 InterMail Node2
eaae  3  1 1546 573424   2656    2112 00:30.14   0.5% TM Fail Safe
eb04  4  1 1aa2 573424   2656    2656 01:09.50   6.6% BD Msged/386 v4.00


HNDL SW TK MAP  TTLMEM SYSMEM  L SYS  CPU TIME CPU UT KY NAME
ee4f  ?  0 5438 650144   1568    1472 06:01.02   1.1%    DV System Task
ea10  1  1 0b62 573952   2144    2144 01:45:13  46.2% MX InterMail Node1
ea5e  2  1 103e 573424   2624    2624 02:05:35  23.1% N2 InterMail Node2
eaae  3  1 1546 573424   2656    2112 00:30.14   0.0% TM Fail Safe
ec22  4  1 1ace 573424   2656    2656 00:12.68  29.7% BD Msged v4.00

  Norton's SI indicates almost no difference in the two.  Is there any
reason I'd want to run "msged.exe" instead of "dos4gw
msged32"?


Gary

gcrain{at}infomail.com
@EOT:

--- Msged/386 4.00