From: Mike N. 

On Mon, 30 Apr 2007 23:43:03 -0400, "Geo."  wrote:

>> But as for the rest of your comment ... the NT4 example is somewhat
>> specious since, as you pointed out elsewhere, it suffers from at least one
>> serious exploit that won't be patched.
>
>I don't patch machines on the internal network, there is no need. On a
>secure internal network you can run unpatched forever. My comments in the
>other thread was in the use of NT4 where it would be exposed to the
>internet.

  I hope you mean server machines - regular machines would still be
vulnerable via the browser, and can attack the servers, unless they are
firewalled off from users as well.

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5