>RKF> Here is were we will probably disagree again ... the AW ban I think is
 >RKF> kinda a good thing if the language was a -lot- better. Supply and
 >RKF> demand, make them harder to get and more expensive and less -crazed-
 >RKF> people will get ahold of them,
 >
 >Less _people_ will get ahold of them . . . .
And I am not sure that is such a bad thing .. at least in the AW range of 
items ... However I realize I want my Pie and Cake too ... although not 
presented as such this was more -out load thinking- ...
 > RKF> . . . and who the hell needs AW!!
 >
 >Anyone fullfilling their obligation to defend their Constitution & country
 >against invaders or tyranny from within.
This is a valid reason ... I am just not sure that in the case AW its worth 
the price ... however you are correct ... on the other hand I do not believe 
that this is even a -reality- anymore ... hand to hand and other -personal- 
fighting is getting rare and if/when it comes to it we probably won't have 
the time to defend out homes and such ...
 > RKF> Face it if
 > RKF> -Uncle Sam- wanted to take over they have much bigger weopons than
 > RKF> anyone of use own or could hope to own!!
 >
 >AR-15's vs. M-16's.
I was thinking AR-15's or M-16's against say .. a tank  .... No match for 
anything -most- will/would own. I firmly believe that this argument no longer 
holds water as a tyranny within will -not- come down to hand to hand combat 
or even fighting across streets ... it will be all too sudden for that ... 
these days ...
--- SLMAIL v4.5a  (#2948)
---------------