| TIP: Click on subject to list as thread! | ANSI |
| echo: | |
|---|---|
| to: | |
| from: | |
| date: | |
| subject: | 24-12 converters |
G'day Chris, 09 Feb 97 10:01, Chris Burgess wrote to Rod Gasson: RG>> I haven't, but I'm a service tech, not a design engineer. I just RG>> fix whats there, rather than redesigning things and changing the RG>> layout. CB> "Redesigning" or whatever you want to call it is something I avoid CB> whenever possible - but occasionally it can't be helped. How often would "occasionally" be? my guess - less than 0.01% of all your repairs? BL>>> all you guys have to do is fix something that an engineer BL>>> designed right, RG>> That's the theory, but surely you are not implying that RG>> everything designed by an engineer is flawless or couldn't be RG>> improved upon? CB> It's not usually the engineer's oversight or fault - the real CB> culprits in "bad design" cases are the accountants and other CB> financial people, looking to cut the costs. Save $1 in parts on a CB> radio that sells a million, and that bumps the company's profit from CB> that radio up by $1,000,000... Frankly, I feel this is wank... sure, the accountants, etc could ask (even demand) that an engineer trim $1.00 off the production costs, but I don't believe for a minute that any of them could have the force to make the engineer do so, well, not unless the engineer in question is so incompetent that he'd fear losing his/her job over it. CB> Within one piece of equipment, true - the problems come up when CB> interconnecting two different things.. in this example, a DC CB> converter and a two way radio. If "Brand X" converter consistently CB> gives the same problem with "Brand Y" radio then it's not a fault CB> (i.e. it wasn't working for a period of time, and then failed), but CB> rather a bad design and either a "mod" or replacement of one of the CB> offending devices are the only cures. CB> If you've done zillions of repairs and never had to do this, then As per my msg to Bob, I was over generalising. CB> the world of VCR's and camcorders is a lot more standardised than CB> the radio game... haven't you ever struck a problem where both CB> "brand X" TV and "brand Y" VCR both work fine on their own, (and CB> fine with "brand A" or brand Z") but not with each other? Only two such cases come to mind.... a very common one being VCR's designed for NTSC playback won't work on all TV's, and the other case was a classic fuckup... one design of an NEC VCR refused to show a stable picture on NEC TV's. (they were fine with other manufacturers sets though) . The thing about VCR's is that they are so crappy and unstable that its a bloody miracle they work at all. RG>> The only service techs that I've known that have RG>> tried to fix a fault be redesigning the circuit have been failed RG>> engineers... CB> OK, what would you do in either of these (real life) senarios? I'd try to redesign them so they work... I'm a failed engineer though. ;-) Cheers, Rod ___ QWKRR128 V4.50 [F] --- FMail 0.94* Origin: QWKRR test point (Aust) (3:800/409.128) SEEN-BY: 50/99 54/99 620/243 623/630 640/820 711/413 430 934 712/311 407 505 SEEN-BY: 712/506 517 610 623 624 704 713/317 714/906 800/1 2 409 419 422 442 SEEN-BY: 800/446 447 453 455 456 459 462 805 810 812 816 822 843 846 @PATH: 800/409 1 712/624 711/934 |
|
| SOURCE: echomail via fidonet.ozzmosis.com | |
Email questions or comments to sysop@ipingthereforeiam.com
All parts of this website painstakingly hand-crafted in the U.S.A.!
IPTIA BBS/MUD/Terminal/Game Server List, © 2025 IPTIA Consulting™.