TIP: Click on subject to list as thread! ANSI
echo: science
to: Herman Trivilino
from: mark lewis
date: 2004-07-09 23:21:08
subject: Relative Humidity

HT> I've been staring at this thing too long.  I reconstructed the
 HT> formula by putting it together in pieces and checking each
 HT> piece as I went.  I finally came up with the following, and it
 HT> DOES work!

glad to see that you got it before getting my initial reply...

 HT> Bulb"+459.4)^4.9283*(10^(23.2801-5287.32/("Wet
                            |
 HT> Bulb"+459.4)^4.9283*(10*(23.2801+(-5287.32/("Wet
                            ^
the difference is right here|

 HT> The only two differences I see are with the extra pair of
 HT> parenthesis, and they turn out to be redundant because when I
 HT> add them to the formula that does work, it makes no
 HT> difference.  So, where's the difference that matters?  Or am I
 HT> just losing my mind!?

nah, just can't see the leaves for looking at the trees ;)

)\/(ark

* Origin: (1:3634/12)
SEEN-BY: 633/267 270
@PATH: 3634/12 106/2000 633/267

SOURCE: echomail via fidonet.ozzmosis.com

Email questions or comments to sysop@ipingthereforeiam.com
All parts of this website painstakingly hand-crafted in the U.S.A.!
IPTIA BBS/MUD/Terminal/Game Server List, © 2025 IPTIA Consulting™.