Hi DM,

A discussion in fido was started based on the PATH kludge on one of my echomails.

My system 3:632/509, exported a message and sent it directly to 1:320/259 - and from there would have been forwarded on to other systems.

d> Nope, I'm direct to 320/219.
d> P@TH: 320/219 292/854

A downstream system asked, (their view of the PATH kludge is above)  why isnt my node address the first in the PATH statement?

Should it be?


...лоеп

---
 ю Synchronet ю Alterant | an SBBS in Docker on Pi!