Message-ID: 

In article ,
 dq831{at}freenet.carleton.ca (Jamie Rosen) wrote:

> Well, they announced the hardcore tag match several hours before RAW 
> started, so I'm inclined to disagree with the second half of that 
> paragraph.

OK.  I didn't know they had announced it.  I can't think of any other 
reason to have had that particular match, though.

> As for cutting it short because it was terrible, well, they haven't cut
> Steiner's feud with Triple H short for that reason yet. 

*sigh*  You're right.

> They probably booked it short to begin with, because they've noticed 
> how every time Steiner is out there for more than a couple of minutes 
> in a wrestling capacity the fans turn on him.

The ending had a hasty, improvised, let's-get-this-thing-over-with feel 
to it.  Of course, my feeling throughout the match was "get it over with 
already!"

> And yet, it was Steiner, not Booker, chasing Triple H backstage...
> wouldn't it have made more sense for it to be the current #1 contender who
> did that, especially since *he* is actually popular?

They had to do *something* with Scotty.

I'm just glad that his real last name is not Steiner.

--Michelle

-- 
We're not human beings having a spiritual experience.  
We're spiritual beings having a human experience.


--- Internet Rex 2.29