CC>        I'm telling you publically because I lost your adress.  I'm 
etting
  >tired of C. Hunter's attitude of I can say whatever I want but I don't 
need 
  >answer anything about it.  I'm sorry, but since I came back online I have 
be
  >nothing but civil to him.  I'm not going to Charles with the problem 
because
  >know he doesn't care.  If he doesn't want to be part of a fairly mature
  >conversation without the childness I see him showing in my oppinion he 
doesn
  >need to be here.  I'm not going to be a part of another flame war like I 
was
  >on Ask a Cop II, so instead I'm telling you.  Do what you will.
Christopher, 
       I do not feel obligated to respond to ANY of your posts.  After
what was pulled on Askacop II I exercised my option to disregard your
posts.  That is my right.  
       YOU are free to post to/with anyone who wants to dialogue with 
you; and I have not attempted to interfere with that in any way.  
However, for you to now come here and start posting......and DEMAND
that I respond to you or face discipline is simply outrageous.
       If the cost of participation in this conference were to be
having to post to/with you, I think I'll just move along to greener
pastures.  You may think you are clever; and that you can start 
something up on this conference.  However, you fail to recognize that 
if I had to participate in this conference on YOUR terms, it would not
be worth participating.
       Before you start with that business about me having to forgive 
you, I would point out that forgiving you does not involve giving you
another chance to strike out at me.
       I would post this privately; but since you made your message to
Paul public, I felt I had to make my position known.
CHARLES HUNTER
 * 1st 2.00 #9124 * A gem is not polished without rubbing
--- QScan/PCB v1.19b / 01-0671
---------------