SK>Tom, I just saw that you are the Co-Moderator. Well, I have a complaint.
SK>You have taken the debate about "commandeering" to a level of personal
  >insult and debasement.
SK>I DO know the Constitution. I just have a differing level of what I will
  >allow per taking of personal rights disguised as law.
SK>It seems you can't, or won't, or will not allow what is simple to me. I
  >see exactly where you are coming from. In my opinion it equals a police
  >state. You being the Co-Moderator of a "cop echo" makes it even more
  >evident.
SK>I will not take more insult, though.
SK>Take it to personal mail, if you wish. I can't, and won't keep restating
  >myself. If you didn't understand what I said the second time...the
  >third..forth...or fifth time....the sixth should have sufficed.
SK>Again:
SK>PERSONAL FREEDOM! NOT INTO POLICE STATES! I WOULD VOLUNTEER TO HELP!
SK>THE POLICE WORK FOR ME! I AM NOT A SLAVE! THE LAW CAN BE WRONG!
Steve:
         I think you fault Tom a bit unfairly.  This post and the
others signed by you indicate a very anti-social mindset on your part.
Commandeering is nothing more than calling upon you as a citizen to do
your duty.  You either want to do your part or you don't.  You either
appreciate the society you live in or you don't.
CHARLES HUNTER
 * 1st 2.00 #9124 * A bad plan is better than no plan at all.
--- QScan/PCB v1.19b / 01-0671
---------------