On 4/04/2019 11:55, Dan Clough -> David Drummond wrote:

 DD>>> What would the IC's role be?

 DC>> That is clearly defined in P4.

 DD>> Only if one has a copy to hand - or do you have the entire
 DD>> document memorised?

 DC> Your logic is quite flawed.  Whether one has a copy at hand or not
 DC> does not change the fact that the IC's role is clearly defined in
 DC> P4, which is what I said.

And if one does not have a copy to hand nor has the document memorised then how
does one know the documented role?

If a tree falls over in the forest and no-one witnesses it, did it make a
noise.

 DC> Read what somebody *SAYS*, not what you
 DC> think they said, or what helps you twist things up to make a
 DC> point.

You would well benefit from the same advice.

 DC> Another clue that you missed was where Bjorn even stated where the
 DC> IC role is discussed in P4 (even though he got the section wrong).

Read it again = he did have it right.

-- 

Gang warily
David

--- Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.8.0