SK>I have addressed my beliefs on the subject of commandeering to a point
  >of redundancy. I'll explain it to you...I think that the surrendering of
  >basic rights (in this case the right to own and keep personal property,
  >and not surrendering it without due process) is paramount. Of course
  >silly hypotheticals can be developed to make the case that my rights
  >should be violated, but I won't submit or agree to such violations. The
  >maintaining of basic rights is more important than hypotheticals. I'm
The constitution (the source of your rights) does NOT guarantee that 
your property will not be seized or commandeered.  It ONLY guarantees 
that your property will NOT be taken without just compensation.
CHARLES HUNTER
 * 1st 2.00 #9124 * 1stReader: Anything else is just stone knives and bear 
skins
--- QScan/PCB v1.19b / 01-0671
---------------