Hello Dan!

27 Mar 19 20:23, Dan Clough wrote to Gerrit Kuehn:

 GK>> Anyone should be able to use threading to look up context
 GK>> (if it should be missing).

 DC> Unless one is reading/replying using an offline mail reader.  
 DC> Didn't think of that, did ya?  Or...maybe you did, and realized 
 DC> that would help your methods even more.

No, I didn't. QWK & co. is archaic and never really existed on this side of the
pond. Being unfamiliar with the technology, I wonder why it should not be able
to do threading, though. And what do you suggest to overcome this? Fullquote
everything?

 DC> I'm not trying to escape arguing,

Yeah, not even trying. You just don't do it.

 DC> just wishing you (and others) 
 DC> would do it a little more genuinely.

Care to elaborate on what you would consider "more genuinely"?
What makes you think that your response to a single sentence from me voicing
some criticism that included only a one-sentence quote of what I was replying
to, instead of a two-sentence fullquote of your text, was appropriate?

 DC> Better yet, stop wasting my time.

Being in a public area here, you asked for it. And we'll both have to bear with
each other.

 DC> ... Post may contain information unsuitable for overly sensitive 
 DC> persons.

Indeed.


Regards,
Gerrit

...  7:40PM  up 87 days, 21:36, 8 users, load averages: 0.21, 0.34, 0.33

--- Msged/BSD 6.1.2