-=> Gerrit Kuehn wrote to Dan Clough <=-

 GK>> Please... afaik neither jurisprudence nor politics claim to be
 GK>> evidence-based science.

 DC> Nice job snipping all the context of what I wrote, in order to
 DC> make your reply seem more valid.

 GK> The one sentence of yours I didn't quote? The one sentence by
 GK> Ward I didn't quote?

Yep.  Sometimes that's all it takes.

 GK> I really cannot see what you're complaining about here.

Yeah, I know you can't.

 GK> Anyone should be able to use threading to look up context
 GK> (if it should be missing).

Unless one is reading/replying using an offline mail reader.  
Didn't think of that, did ya?  Or...maybe you did, and realized 
that would help your methods even more.

 DC> Very easy to spot that kind of bullshit, and laugh at it.

 GK> Yeah, and a rather obvious attempt of yours to escape argueing
 GK> based on content (or even "facts"). I hope you're happy that I
 GK> quoted this important note of yours this time. ;-)

I'm not trying to escape arguing, just wishing you (and others) 
would do it a little more genuinely.

Better yet, stop wasting my time.



... Post may contain information unsuitable for overly sensitive persons.
=== MultiMail/Linux v0.51
--- SBBSecho 3.07-Linux