From   Wed, 21 May 2003 17:23:06 -0700 remote from
fanciful.org
Received: by fanciful.org (Wildcat! SMTP Router v5.6.450.61)
          for photo{at}fanciful.org; Wed, 21 May 2003 17:23:06 -0700
Received: from N1D.tzo.com ([140.239.225.181]) HELO=saf.tzo.com
          by fanciful.org (Wildcat! SMTP v5.6.450.61) with SMTP
          id 1367371500; Wed, 21 May 2003 17:23:04 -0700
Received: from 216.174.194.56 by saf.tzo.com
 id 2003052120220681267 for photo{at}fanciful.org;
 Thu, 22 May 2003 00:22:06 GMT
Received: (qmail 8849 invoked from network); 22 May 2003 00:22:45 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO Carl?Cook.olywa.net) (64.42.61.216)
  by queue2.atgi.net with SMTP; 22 May 2003 00:22:45 -0000
Message-Id: 
X-Sender: clcook{at}mail.olywa.net
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1
Date: Wed, 21 May 2003 17:24:51 -0700
To: 
From: Carl Cook 
Subject: Re: Frog
In-Reply-To: 
X-Orig-Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Orig-Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed

No, I'm a lousy sport! Now you caught me. Now you know the secrets of the 
snacks I keep under the bed! Yummy bugs! Dang frog!

C

At 08:45 PM 5/20/2003 -0700, you wrote:

> >From: karen.wattie{at}fanciful.org
> >Reply-To: 
> >To: photo{at}fanciful.org
> >Subject: Re: Frog
> >Date: Mon, 19 May 2003 01:53:06 -0700
> >
> >TID: PX/Win v3.0pr5 PX97-0943M2
> >MSGID: 2:252/171 d3e6dd27
> >TZUTC: 0100
> >Hi Wayne
> >
> >-> I guess he was looking for bugs until you came along, eh?   :)
> >
> >Oh my.....are you implying that Carl has bugs under his bed?
>
>Haha... that was a friendly tease, not a friendly fire!   :)
>Carl is a good sport!  :))
>
>
>
> >->
> >-> I really got a kick on the one in which he shot away like an arrow!
> >-> Say, was this one recaptured from your movie frame? The timing was
> >perfect!
> >
> >-> :)
> >-> Most people's reaction time, including mine, would miss it unless it
> >says 1,
> >
> >-> 2, 3, jump!
> >
> >Actually, that's likely how he got the shot.  Most of today's computerized
> >cameras seem to have a damn built in hesitation that drives me nuts.
>
>Yes, if you have the 'plunger' type of trigger, there is the 8 to 12
>millisecond of time delay after you pressed the trigger. The 'red-eye'
>reduction type of camera has up to 2 seconds of time delay after you press
>the trigger. The 'pro' cameras are almost instantaneous but still has some
>measurable lag time, but compared to the human reaction time, it is nothing.
>
>If the flash can be switched off on the 'red-eye' reduction camera, the lag
>time can be improved greatly.
>
>
>
> >He probably had a perfectly good shot all framed and the frog decided to
> >leap
> >when it heard the click. The slight hesitation managed to catch him in mid
> >air.  Lucky, that was, as I'm sure I'd end up with no sign of the frog if I
> >tried it.
>
>
>Hehe... perhaps it was Carl's pet, they practice the trick on Victoria
>Holidays!??   :))
>
>
>-Wayne
>
>_________________________________________________________________
>The new MSN 8: smart spam protection and 2 months FREE*
>http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail
>
>
>
>
>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>To unsubscribe, send e-mail to wclistserve{at}fanciful.org with
>UNSUBSCRIBE photo in the message body on a line by itself.
>To contact the list admin, e-mail Tom.Lebens{at}fanciful.org
>---------------------------------------------------------------------

e-mail: clcook{at}olywa.net
http://www.clcookphoto.com

--- Platinum Xpress/Win/WINServer v3.0pr5