-=> Quoting Dan Arico to Guy Putnam <=-
 GP> Everyone has a different scam up their sleeve for voting for Dole,
 GP> be it Su[preme Court nominees or to keep Klinton out, etc, etc.
 GP> They all lead to voting, again, for another anti-gunner.
 DA> On this and other networks, I've been hit with a whole bunch of
 DA> reasons  why I should vote for Dole:
Seems to be a new one every day.
 DA> 1. He served in WWII while Clinton dodged Viet Nam.
 DA> 2. He doesn't cheat on his wife.
 DA> Now one and two do show some positive reasons (although at 73 years
 DA> old,  I'm not sure #2 counts)
I don't think #1 counts either, when we remember that Hitler served his
country in WWI.
 DA> 3. His Supreme Court nominations won't be as bad.
 DA> 4. He won't support as much gun control.
 DA> 5. He won't violate the First Amendment as often.
 DA> 6. He isn't as pro-abortion.
 DA> Now one and two do show some positive reasons (although at 73 years
 DA> old,  I'm not sure #2 counts), but all the rest add up to "He's not as
 DA> big a  schmuck as Clinton."
Exactly!
 DA> All of the political professionals I know are agreed that Dole is
 DA> going down hard. 
I think so, too.
 DA> Therefore, any vote for Dole is a wasted vote - it
 DA> would be better to vote for a long shot like Harry Browne (who *would*
 DA> be an  improvement) rather than throwing your vote away on a loser.
Some where along the way, knee-deep in the Conflict of Opposites, people
forgot to vote for who they _wanted_ to be president.
... Live by their perception, then you're living by their brainwashing!
--- Blue Wave v2.12 [NR]
---------------