To: Roger Cravens
Subject: Status of US Scanner News
RC>        Although we demand retractions to mitigate the potential damages
  >to U.S. Scanner Publications, we are not waiving any claims for damages.
  >We are in the process of determining the scope of damages and will
  >advise you immediately once we have made an accurate determination of
  >the amount, if any, of ultimate financial injury.
If that is the case, why should any of the people named make a
retraction if there is going to be damages anyway?  Seems they're more
interested in the MONEY than in the truth to me.
---
   OLX 1.53   -------------->    73, de NK2U    <----------------
---------------