From   Wed, 23 Apr 2003 12:55:31 -0700
remote from fanciful.org
Received: by fanciful.org (Wildcat! SMTP Router v5.6.450.61)
          for photo{at}fanciful.org; Wed, 23 Apr 2003 12:55:31 -0700
Received: from saf.tzo.com ([140.239.225.181]) HELO=saf.tzo.com
          by fanciful.org (Wildcat! SMTP v5.6.450.61) with SMTP
          id 448973187; Wed, 23 Apr 2003 12:55:27 -0700
Received: from 199.185.220.220 by saf.tzo.com
 id 2003042315585246895 for photo{at}fanciful.org;
 Wed, 23 Apr 2003 19:58:52 GMT
Received: from computer ([66.222.145.239]) by priv-edtnes62.telusplanet.net
          (InterMail vM.5.01.05.17 201-253-122-126-117-20021021) with SMTP
          id 
          for ; Wed, 23 Apr 2003 13:55:20 -0600
Message-ID: 
From: "Larry N. Bolch" 
To: 
References: 
Subject: Re: Fake or foto
Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2003 13:53:59 -0600
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
 charset="Windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106
X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106

karen.wattie{at}fanciful.org at karen.wattie{at}fanciful.org wrote:


> -> I do have an 18 second highly compressed and low-resolution clip from
> of -> this - 651K. Small enough to be e-mailed if anyone would like a
> peek. It is -> compressed with a WMV codec and runs on Windows Media
> Player. It is like a -> highly compressed JPEG with visible artifacting.
> Most of what I do is in -> high resolution, is much longer and produces
> huge files. It makes no attempt -> to be photorealistic, though the
> mannequins do move rather well and the -> lighting is nice.
>
> I'd certainly love to see that!!!  Do you still have my e-mail address?

I think so, unless it has changed. I will try to send to that now. If you
don't get it, drop me an e-mail at lnbolch{at}telusplanet.net

larry!
ICQ 76620504
http://www.larry-bolch.com/

--- Platinum Xpress/Win/WINServer v3.0pr5