-=> David Drummond wrote to Robert Stinnett <=-
DD> Is limiting Fidonet to one zone moving "forward" or moving
DD> "backward". Fidonet was effectively one zone once and we "moved
DD> forward" from that.
Yes, it "moved forward" because of the HUGE increase in nodes,
across the entire globe.
Then it peaked.
Then... it nose-dived. What's the comparison of nodes now
compared to the peak in the mid-90's? 10% ? Less maybe?
So, logic would tell you that it *IS* time to drastically reduce
the number of zones, right? Of course there are other factors, I
know, including embedded software reasons and political/historical
bad blood. So the decision (and need) becomes a cloudy issue.
DD> Is change for the sake of change any more advantage than sticking
DD> to tradition because "that's how we've always done it"?
No, it isn't. But the question at hand here is not as simple as
you phrased it right there.
... Pros are those who do their jobs well, even when they don't feel like it.
=== MultiMail/Linux v0.51
--- SBBSecho 3.06-Linux
* Origin: Palantir * palantirbbs.ddns.net * Pensacola, FL * (1:123/115)
|