TIP: Click on subject to list as thread! ANSI
echo: fidonews
to: DAVID DRUMMOND
from: DAN CLOUGH
date: 2019-03-20 21:30:00
subject: Re: Fidonet = one unizon

-=> David Drummond wrote to Robert Stinnett <=-

 DD> Is limiting Fidonet to one zone moving "forward" or moving
 DD> "backward". Fidonet was effectively one zone once and we "moved
 DD> forward" from that.

Yes, it "moved forward" because of the HUGE increase in nodes, 
across the entire globe.

Then it peaked.

Then... it nose-dived.  What's the comparison of nodes now 
compared to the peak in the mid-90's?  10% ?  Less maybe?

So, logic would tell you that it *IS* time to drastically reduce 
the number of zones, right?  Of course there are other factors, I 
know, including embedded software reasons and political/historical 
bad blood.  So the decision (and need) becomes a cloudy issue.

 DD> Is change for the sake of change any more advantage than sticking
 DD> to tradition because "that's how we've always done it"?

No, it isn't.  But the question at hand here is not as simple as 
you phrased it right there.



... Pros are those who do their jobs well, even when they don't feel like it.
=== MultiMail/Linux v0.51
--- SBBSecho 3.06-Linux
* Origin: Palantir * palantirbbs.ddns.net * Pensacola, FL * (1:123/115)

SOURCE: echomail via QWK@docsplace.org

Email questions or comments to sysop@ipingthereforeiam.com
All parts of this website painstakingly hand-crafted in the U.S.A.!
IPTIA BBS/MUD/Terminal/Game Server List, © 2025 IPTIA Consulting™.