Dan Clough : Nick Andre wrote:

> You're right that putting up websites willy-nilly doesn't help
> much.  I have only seen ONE new one (fidonet.io) put up recently.

Doesn't google prioritize results based on the sites people visit the most
often?  ..and from that, position the search results closer to the top each
time?  Among the collection of willy-nilly sites out there, certain ones would
ultimately rise to the top and proved to be "the" site to get the right info.

> ..Keeping dead websites around
> that contain nothing but dead links isn't helping anybody.  Is it?
> What is the logical answer, then?  Yes.  Put up a website with
> useful information that will HELP people instead of frustrate
> them.  I believe that's all that's going on here.

We need to support fidonet.io at this juncture.

--- Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (Windows/20100228)