Re: Re: Fidonet => one unizon
  By: Dan Clough to Nick Andre on Tue Mar 19 2019 08:21 am

 > much.  I have only seen ONE new one (fidonet.io) put up recently.
 > Again it always seems to come back to people being frustrated with
 > the NON-availability of valid, up-to-date INFORMATION on FidoNet.
 > I'm not sure how anyone who claims to want to promote/grow FidoNet
 > could be opposed to such a thing.  Keeping dead websites around
 > that contain nothing but dead links isn't helping anybody.  Is it?
 > What is the logical answer, then?  Yes.  Put up a website with
 > useful information that will HELP people instead of frustrate
 > them.  I believe that's all that's going on here.
 >

My personal thought is this:  Nobody has a monopoly on information.  If you
create a good, updated source of information then people are going to use it
and link to it and your site will naturally float to the top on Google and
other search engines.

I don't play these "pissing games" about who owns what domain, and who can use
what domain for what.  If you have the dedication and desire to go make
something that is up to date, I will support your effort 100%.  Those who want
to complain I just turn a deaf ear too.
--- SBBSecho 3.06-Linux