Re: Re: synchronet behind a reverse proxy
  By: martylake to deon on Thu Nov 25 2021 10:23 am

 >  > So reconfigure the websockets part to connect to haproxy's port, not SBBS directly.
 >
 > The issue is that websocket is a protocol on top of http, that's why we need a websocket->telnet proxy. The issue if I understand correctly is that this proxy is not forwarding haproxy information to the backend.

Correct, there are two paths that could address this.

* The websocket connects to haproxy, not SBBS directly.

* The websocket speaks that haproxy protocol when talking with SBBS directly.

The first is probably easy to do, if you can configure it via a config file (sorry I dont know).

The second would require development I'm guessing...


...лоеп

---
 ю Synchronet ю Alterant | an SBBS in Docker on Pi!