SM> While I disagree with *most* of their policies, and know first hand
  > that many disobey the very laws they are _Sworn_ to enforce, I tend to
  > believe *we* are in existence to provide the public and private
  > sectors safety & security in today's society, and stop very short of
  > any type of name calling as that tends to lead nowhere.
You do quite well insulting the profession with your blanket 
accusations of wrongdoing.  As for your "we", I would remind you that
it is the Sworn Police Officers who are in existance to provide safety
and security.  Private security companies exist for the purpose of
making a buck.....period.
CHARLES HUNTER
 * 1st 2.00 #9124 * No one watches until you make a mistake.
--- QScan/PCB v1.19b / 01-0671
---------------