Hello Bj”rn,
On Saturday March 10 2018 23:52, you wrote to me:
BF> {W32 API error 10065} A socket operation was attempted to an
BF> unreachable host
BF> Now I get this:
BF> {W32 API error 10049} The requested address is not valid in its
BF> context
I would not worry too much about the different error responses. In my
experience the binkd error reports are always a bit cryptic and erratic.
The bottom line is that your he.net tunnel is not working.
o If this is due to your mobile ISP blocking protocol 41 as Tommi suggested,
the only solution I see is to change provider.
o From my SixXs days, I remember I had a task running that pinged the SixXs
side of my tunnel every second. I do not recall why this was needed, it is too
long ago, but without it, the tunnel would not stay up.
o For my he.net tunnel I had to explicitly tell the firewall to pass prootol
41.
o Have you tried the heartbeat option of he.net? I have never used it myself,
but from what i understand, it deals with tunnel endpoints at the client side
that have a dynamic IPv4 address.
I hate to do this, but I am afraid I shall have to flag you as temporary IPv6
down in the list of IPv6 nodes. Accuracy over vanity...
Cheers, Michiel
--- GoldED+/W32-MSVC 1.1.5-b20170303
* Origin: he.net certified sage (2:280/5555)
|