GV>Granted.  And I don't mean to be hostile towards you...I guess it's just 
tha
  >I can see perfectly clear why the cop wanted the on/off switch, and the 
exac
  >reasons it would be needed.  You obviosuly can't so let's leave it at
  >that...thank goodness the cop who got the recorder rigged the way it was
  >originally described has the forsight to see why it was needed from a 
safety
  >and evidence point of view.  I'd do the same thing and could give a good 
rat
  >ass what some bottom feeding defence lawyer might infer or suggest...I've
  >heard it all, and from the best of them...they'll infer and suggest it 
anywa
  >so it's no big deal...
And risk blowing your case?
CHARLES HUNTER
 * 1st 2.00 #9124 * If num(cooks) > max(cooks), broth = spoiled
--- QScan/PCB v1.19b / 01-0671
---------------