Hello Mark,

It is NOT a fidonet problem, if law enforcement want to trace the person it is
their problem, again a real name or not makes no differece.

It is impossible to know whether a name is real or not so why try.

Terry Roati - 3:640/1321

On Jul 26, 2019 11:02am, mark lewis wrote to TERRY ROATI:


 ml>  On 2019 Jul 26 14:10:30, you wrote to me:

 TR>> The name means nothing, being able to trace it back to the person who
 ml> wrote
 TR>> it does,

 ml> how are you going to do that on POTS with no callerID?

 TR>> in Fidonet tracing it back to the source can be done,

 ml> explain... the best you can get if non-POTS is an IP address which
 ml> could be a proxy or TOR... then what?

 TR>> so wether the name is real or not is mute.

 ml> the term is "moot"... "mute" means "to quiet"... "moot" means
 ml> "object/subject of/to discussion"

 ml> BTW: top posting sucks! i refuse to fix top posted quotes to provide
 ml> proper context of replies... this is fidonet, damnit! ;) :) O:)

 ml> )\/(ark

 ml> Once men turned their thinking over to machines in the hope that this
 ml> would set them free. But that only permitted other men with machines to
 ml> enslave them. ... CON is the opposite of PRO - i.e. Congress and
 ml> Progress. ---

... Platinum Xpress & Wildcat!..... Nice!!!!
--- Platinum Xpress/Win/WINServer v7.0