IT'S LATER THAN YOU THINK
THE NEW WORLD ORDER IS JUST AROUND THE CORNER

By: Jacques Meihoff

As America sleeps, globalization is firmly underway. The simple fact is 
that the hour is later than most people think when it comes to the move 
towards a collective global nation-state. The European Union is steadily 
coalescing itself into a virus-like entity with tentacles that are 
insinuating themselves into more and more sociopolitical orifices 
in both Europe and the US.  

We barely grunt at these unsolicited penetrations as a European 
governing body which voted itself into existence, arbitrarily assumes 
more and more power for itself, passing so-called "laws" that give it 
the de-facto authority to dictate everything from religious expression 
to Internet publishing standards for countries that are not even officially 
part of its Union!  

For example, the International Criminal Court has given ITSELF 
authority to punish a web author for "hate crimes" if material on a 
website, though legal in the country where it originates and is hosted, 
is VIEWED in a country that has legislation prohibiting such expressions.  

And we blithely give these groups credibility by running to them for 
ever-more expansive rulings regarding everything from ecological 
preservation to copyright violations. Every time we ask for a ruling 
by the ICC or its ilk, we establish a ruling that becomes a legal 
precedent merely by the fact of its existence.  

Every time this precedent is referenced in subsequent rulings (yes, even 
by our U.S. Supreme Court!), it gains even more credibility, even though 
the original finding was provided by an organization with no legal right 
to exist, and no binding legal authority in this country!  

I was recently privy to a fairly high-level brief by a strategic military 
and political planner who spoke of globalization not only as highly desirable,
but as an all but forgone conclusion. Countries with strong, nationalistic 
identities were viewed as "old world" and presented as the enemies of 
globalization, and thus indirectly, enemies of the United States.  

That's right. The United States was presented by this senior military 
planner as being at the forefront of the move towards an interdependent 
global identity. He spoke of finding and implementing ways to deal with 
"system perturbations," which were defined as actions by those who 
won't "get on board" with globalism.  

Traditionally this has meant third world countries, especially those of 
fundamentalist Muslim foundations. I am not making this up. In effect, 
those who oppose globalism are in effect third-world throwbacks who 
won't get on board, and so have to be dealt with. So boil it down to 
one sound-bite: Under current political thought at the highest levels, 
opposition to globalism equates with terrorism in both the perceived 
threat and required response. You read it here first.  

I suspect that the move towards globalism is about three or four steps 
ahead of where most people, even those who view themselves as informed, 
think we are. You can see hints of it in many shapes and forms. Notice 
that many phone numbers, especially on widely sold products, now use a 
period instead of a dash to separate the numbers (i.e. - 209.555.1212).  
This is a European convention that is quietly, without fanfare and little 
notice, being widely adopted by businesses and political institutions.  

Nearly all operational and strategic military doctrine and planning hinge 
on the concept of "jointness." This is not just joint service commitments, 
such as conducting warfare using assets from the Air Force, Navy, Army and 
Marines, but also Joint in the aspect of relying on foreign countries to 
fill out our force mix. Much planning and thought is going into how to 
best operate in a "joint environment" and "joint theatres of
conflict."  

Some would say that you can't maintain control over a world government 
of such a scale. You can if control is mostly voluntary, under the color 
of treaty and international law. Enforced by economic sanctions and 
military force. How viable could such a military be? Western Navies 
have in their inventory catamaran-hulled "fast response ships" which 
can cruise at upwards of 80 knots -- nearly three times as fast as 
the 25 knots capable by most older amphibious ships, changing response 
times from days to mere hours.  

They can offload an entire Battalion Landing Team in 20 minutes. The 
US is also developing a hypersonic bomber capable of carrying out an 
unmanned attack anywhere in the world in two hours. The social, 
political, and military resources needed to make the "global village" 
work are inexorably being worked into place. Penalties for opposition 
and/or noncompliance are being established and given progressively 
greater authority and legitimacy by sold-out politicians who have read 
the writing on the wall and are working to secure their place as high 
up as possible in the new world's command structure.  

Don't be fooled into thinking the the US is some valiant bulwark against 
globalism. Our legislative, judicial, and executive branches are not only 
greasing the rails, but pouring coals to the locomotive as well. And here 
we sit in the dining car, blissfully playing Canasta while our destiny is 
decided for us because we care not for where the train is going, as long 
as our glass is full and our seat cushions soft.  


"Published originally at EtherZone.com : republication allowed with this 
notice and hyperlink intact."

Published in the July 3, 2003 issue of Ether Zone.
Copyright (c) 1997 - 2003 Ether Zone.

                            -==-

Source: Ether Zone - http://etherzone.com/2003/meih070303.shtml


Cheers, Steve..

---