-=> David Drummond wrote to Dan Clough <=-
BF>> With only all the working BBSs nodelisted, and all the other,
BF>> glorified point systems connected to those few (50 or so?), it would
BF>> be a piece of cake to create a true, complete mesh of fidonet nodes.
DC> I don't even know what to make of his claim of there being only 50
DC> working BBS's in the nodelist. Is he saying that unless you're a *C,
DC> you're not a real BBS?
DD> I think he is suggesting that unless a "system" has users other
DD> than the "sysop" then it shouldn't be nodelisted.
Ahhh, that could be it. Pretty hard to put into practice though,
and the number of users is a moving target.
DD> Having a *C badge is not required.
DD> There are no other users availing themselves of my "system" -
DD> although I do have a *C badge. Should my system only be a point
DD> and not a "full nodelisted" node?
Of course not. I don't have many users either, but that's the way
of the world nowadays.
... If it walks out of your refrigerator, let it go.
=== MultiMail/Linux v0.51
--- SBBSecho 3.06-Linux
* Origin: Palantir * palantirbbs.ddns.net * Pensacola, FL * (1:123/115)
|