BW>No, no error, and '/a' is what I meant, but I think you're right. A
BW>compiler should post an error or at least a warning, IMHO. I started
BW>using two char constants a couple years ago, not realizing it was a bad
BW>idea, and not at all portable evidently... Now I'd like to rewrite all
BW>the code that uses this type, and I'm looking for the best way.
Try "/a" instead of '/a'. This produces a const string. After that try
to compile and correct all the errors that could arise.
* SLMR 2.1a * I'm in shape ... round's a shape isn't it?
--- FMail 0.92
---------------
* Origin: The Programmer's Oasis on FIDONET! (1:348/203)
|