From   Sun, 27 Apr 2003 16:47:07 -0700
remote from fanciful.org
Received: by fanciful.org (Wildcat! SMTP Router v5.6.450.61)
          for photo{at}fanciful.org; Sun, 27 Apr 2003 16:47:07 -0700
Received: from saf.tzo.com ([140.239.225.181]) HELO=saf.tzo.com
          by fanciful.org (Wildcat! SMTP v5.6.450.61) with SMTP
          id 31590984; Sun, 27 Apr 2003 16:47:05 -0700
Received: from 199.185.220.221 by saf.tzo.com
 id 2003042719503453151 for photo{at}fanciful.org;
 Sun, 27 Apr 2003 23:50:34 GMT
Received: from computer ([66.222.145.239])
          by priv-edtnes10-hme0.telusplanet.net
          (InterMail vM.5.01.05.17 201-253-122-126-117-20021021) with SMTP
          id

          for ; Sun, 27 Apr 2003 17:46:57 -0600
Message-ID: 
From: "Larry N. Bolch" 
To: 
References: 
Subject: Re: Sequences
Date: Sun, 27 Apr 2003 17:45:33 -0600
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
 charset="Windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165

Wayne Young at wayne_b_young{at}hotmail.com wrote:


> Neat!
> Keeping the background exposure consistent with that of the moving target
> is marvelous!

Since the whole shoot takes place in just a few seconds, it is not even a
consideration. Of course while the subject is moving, both the camera and
background are fixed in place, so it is only necessary to blow little holes
in the layers as they are added.

If for any reason the background exposure did change in the middle of the
sequence, it is very easy to match it visually by tweaking a little with
Levels. For architectural interior shots like those at the bottom of the
Bracketing and Layering page, one expects to do a bit to make the
transitions invisible.

http://www.larry-bolch.com/layers.htm

larry!
ICQ 76620504
http://www.larry-bolch.com/

--- Platinum Xpress/Win/WINServer v3.0pr5