Hello Alexey,
On Tuesday March 28 2017 15:28, you wrote to me:
AV>>> INA:192.0.2.123,INA:[2001:db8:f1d0::1234],IBN is a legal
AV>>> set of flags.
MvdV>> Maybe, but it is not common practise...
AV> Hmmmm... Well, for now there are no literal IPv6 in the nodelist:
AV> % egrep 'INA:\[' ~/fido/etc/nodelist.ndl | wc -l
AV> 0
Indeed, no literal IPv6 address in the nodelist right now. But there has been
at least one in the past. In NODELIST.036 of 2016. I wrote a Fidonews article
about it in Feb 2016.
AV> Although multiple INA flags may be used to list both IPv4 and IPv6
AV> literal addresses, this is not recommended; use domain name instead.
The problem with "recommendations" is that there is no global consencus on the
degree of compulsivity. In some cultures, such as mine, "not recomended" is
almost equivalent to "not allowed", only to be used when there is absolutely no
other way. In other cultures, apparently in parts of Northern America, a
"recommendation" means little or nothing and can be ignored without
consequences.
Cheers, Michiel
--- GoldED+/W32-MSVC 1.1.5-b20161221
* Origin: http://www.vlist.org (2:280/5555)
|