[Mar 09, 97 - 22:02] Chris Hogan of 3:800/444{at}fidonet wrote to all:

CH> just wondering if anyone has noticed that the screen draw in this version 
CH> (running under 95) is SLOWWWW.
CH> Message scanning is VERY fast compared to the dos 16bit version, however 
CH> the nt/95 version screen draws are reminicent of ansi with a 2400 baud 
CH> modem!!

I had the same experience, and went back to the DOS/32 version.  I also
found that the mouse didn't work on some things, by the way.

::: It is easier to fight for one's principles than to live up to them. -
ALFRED ADLER
˙

Jerry Schwartz
@EOT:

--- Msged/386 4.00

SDŽ¯č:!