In article , lsenders{at}hotmail.com
says...

>Matthew Johnson wrote:
>> In article ,
>lsenders{at}hotmail.com
>
>> > but there is so much more to it.  It boggles me how
>> >complex it is.
>>
>> If it 'boggles' you, you should have knon better than to speak about
>things you
>> know nothing about. But you persist. SO I woudl sya you are not
>'boggled'
>> enough.
>>
>I would expect such a logical conclusion from you.

Then what _were_ you thinking when you posted that nonsense?

>  You reject the sole
>authority of the scriptures which means nothing short of placing the
>authority of rational men over them.

It means no such thing. It no more "places the authroity of rational men over
them" than does _your_ accepting the use of UBS editions, which replace the text
the Church recognized as authentic Scripture with a scholarly reconstruction of
the late 2nd century Alexandrian text.

[snip]


-- 
---------------------------
Subudcat se sibi ut haereat Deo
quidquid boni habet, tribuat illi a quo factus est.
(St. Augustine, Ser. 96)

((( s.r.c.b-s is a moderated group.  All posts are approved by a moderator. )))
(((   Read http://srcbs.org for details about this group BEFORE you post.   )))


--- UseNet To RIME Gateway {at} 2/23/05 1:50:51 PM ---