Matthew Johnson wrote:
> In article ,
>
> I understand the implication of the tenses fully. But I do NOT find
any support
> for your disastrous bad dogma in any of John's epistles.
>

That's because your fail in your theology from the very start in
disallowing the sin of Adam passing onto the entire **race** of which
he was a federal representative (Rom 5).  So the very presuppositions
out of which you form your system of theology is wrong.  Get the
foundation off kilter just a bit and the entire house is out of wack.

The "disastrous bad dogma" is your refusal to accept the depravity  of
man, -mankind.

((( s.r.c.b-s is a moderated group.  All posts are approved by a moderator. )))
(((   Read http://srcbs.org for details about this group BEFORE you post.   )))


--- UseNet To RIME Gateway {at} 2/25/05 9:33:27 PM ---