Hello Wilfred,

On Mon Jan 30 2017 22:10:02, Wilfred van Velzen wrote to Nicholas Boel:

 WV>>> Don't forget you are documenting current practise. Not how
 WV>>> things _should_ be!

 NB>> As far as I can tell, everything in the unmodified "Draft #3" I
 NB>> posted covers everything in FTS-0001 and then some. So I would
 NB>> say "current practice" is being documented for both backwards AND
 NB>> forwards compatibility.

 WV> I'm talking about your suggestion to change the dayOfMonth from 1..31
 WV> to 0..30 to be in line with the other fields. Such a change would
 WV> break existing software.

And I'm not. That suggestion has already been explained in case you hadn't
noticed. I've already moved back to the original draft before you attempted to
encourage me to make any (unnecessary) changes.

Regards,
Nick

... "Не знаю. Я здесь только работаю."
--- GoldED+/LNX 1.1.5-b20161221