Hello Richard,

On Mon Jan 30 2017 21:20:08, Richard Menedetter wrote to Nicholas Boel:

 NB>> That only leaves the leap seconds. Do we want to account for that
 NB>> for the future? Or leave it as is (currently not in use)?

 RM> From my point of view yes.
 RM> Only to be prepared if software correctly adds a leap second.
 RM> And hoping that software that does not take this into account does not
 RM> choke. But the propability that somebody writes a message exactly at
 RM> the time the leap second is added is small ...

Exactly. Why not have it documented to reflect any of this if a developer
chooses to do so? In doing so, not only is Fidonet current practice covered,
but so is any Fidonet software that uses internet capabilities, too!

Regards,
Nick

... "Не знаю. Я здесь только работаю."
--- GoldED+/LNX 1.1.5-b20161221