CT> I've already stated that pornographic novels and text
 CT>  could
 CT>  fall under the first amendment but not graphic-based material of
 CT>  today,
 CT>  which is a far cry from drawings/paintings of the 1700s.
 BW> Again -- you simply are COMPLETELY IGNORANT on this.
Whatever.  You have your opinion.  I have mine.
And that is that.  Nothing more need be said.  L8R
--- Telegard/2 v3.09.b18/mL
---------------