Hello Michiel,

On Mon Jan 30 2017 16:56:20, Michiel van der Vlist wrote to Nicholas Boel:

 NB>> Odd that internet RFCs seem to account for a 24th hour, and a
 NB>> 60th minute and/or second though.

 MV> The FTSC documents Fidonet, NOT the InterNet. Refering to RFCs can be
 MV> helpful, but RFC are never leading. What is leading id Fidonet current
 MV> practise.

 MV> Twist it any way you want, 24 for the hour and 60 for the minutes and
 MV> seconds is NOT Fidonet current practise. And will never be compatible
 MV> with Fidonet current practise.

As far as I can tell, everything in the unmodified "Draft #3" I posted covers
everything in FTS-0001 and then some. So I would say "current practice" is
being documented for both backwards AND forwards compatibility.

Regards,
Nick

... "Не знаю. Я здесь только работаю."
--- GoldED+/LNX 1.1.5-b20161221